Search Help Sitemap Download
Verizon 2005 Interactive Annual Report
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Significant Accounting Policies

A summary of the significant accounting policies used in preparing our financial statements are as follows:

  • Special and non-recurring items generally represent revenues and gains as well as expenses and losses that are non-operational and/or non-recurring in nature. Several of these special and non-recurring items include impairment losses. These impairment losses were determined in accordance with our policy of comparing the fair value of the asset with its carrying value. The fair value is determined by quoted market prices or by estimates of future cash flows. There is inherent subjectivity involved in estimating future cash flows, which can have a significant impact on the amount of any impairment.
  • Verizon’s plant, property and equipment balance represents a significant component of our consolidated assets. Depreciation expense on Verizon’s telephone operations is principally based on the composite group remaining life method and straight-line composite rates, which provides for the recognition of the cost of the remaining net investment in telephone plant, less anticipated net salvage value, over the remaining asset lives. We depreciate other plant, property and equipment generally on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets. Changes in the remaining useful lives of assets as a result of technological change or other changes in circumstances, including competitive factors in the markets where we operate, can have a significant impact on asset balances and depreciation expense.
  • We maintain benefit plans for most of our employees, including pension and other postretirement benefit plans. In the aggregate, the fair value of pension plan assets exceeds benefit obligations, which contributes to pension plan income. Other postretirement benefit plans have larger benefit obligations than plan assets, resulting in expense. Significant benefit plan assumptions, including the discount rate used, the long-term rate of return on plan assets and heath care trend rates are periodically updated and impact the amount of benefit plan income, expense, assets and obligations (see “Consolidated Results of Operations – Consolidated Operating Expenses – Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits”). A sensitivity analysis of the impact of changes in these assumptions on the benefit obligations and expense (income) recorded as of December 31, 2005 and for the year then ended pertaining to Verizon’s pension and postretirement benefit plans is provided in the tables below. Note that some of these sensitivities are not symmetrical as the calculations were based on all of the actuarial assumptions as of year-end.
Pension Plans
(dollars in millions )

Pension expense  

    Benefit obligation   increase (decrease )

Percentage   increase (decrease) at   for the year ended  

point change   December 31, 2005   December 31, 2005  
Discount rate
  +1.00   $ (4,093 ) $ (216 )

  -1.00     5,165     173  
Long-term rate of return on plan assets
  +1.00         (393 )

  -1.00         393  
Postretirement Plans
(dollars in millions )

        Postretirement  

        benefit expense  

    Benefit obligation   increase (decrease )

Percentage   increase (decrease) at   for the year ended  

point change   December 31, 2005   December 31, 2005  
Discount rate
  +1.00   $ (3,315 ) $ (186 )

  -1.00     3,774     221  
Long-term rate of return on plan assets
  +1.00         (45 )

  -1.00         45  
Health care trend rates
  +1.00     3,378     474  

  -1.00     (2,745 )   (352 )
  • Our accounting policy concerning the method of accounting applied to investments (consolidation, equity or cost) involves an evaluation of all significant terms of the investments that explicitly grant or suggest evidence of control or influence over the operations of the entity in which we have invested. Where control is determined, we consolidate the investment. If we determine that we have significant influence over the operating and financial policies of an entity in which we have invested, we apply the equity method. We apply the cost method in situations where we determine that we do not have significant influence.
  • Our current and deferred income taxes, and associated valuation allowances, are impacted by events and transactions arising in the normal course of business as well as in connection with special and non-recurring items. Assessment of the appropriate amount and classification of income taxes is dependent on several factors, including estimates of the timing and realization of deferred income tax assets and the timing of income tax payments. Actual collections and payments may materially differ from these estimates as a result of changes in tax laws as well as unanticipated future transactions impacting related income tax balances.
  • Intangible assets are a significant component of our consolidated assets. Wireless licenses of $47,804 million represent the largest component of our intangible assets. Our wireless licenses are indefinite-lived intangible assets, and as required by SFAS No. 142, are not amortized but are periodically evaluated for impairment. Any impairment loss would be determined by comparing the fair value of the wireless licenses with their carrying value. For 2004 and 2003, we used a residual method, which determined fair value by estimating future cash flows of the wireless business. Beginning in 2005, we began using a direct value approach in accordance with a September 29, 2004 Staff Announcement from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), “Use of the Residual Method to Value Acquired Assets Other Than Goodwill.” The direct value approach also determines fair value by estimating future cash flows. There is inherent subjectivity involved in estimating future cash flows, which can have a material impact on the amount of any impairment.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Stock-Based Compensation
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” which revises SFAS No. 123. SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized as compensation expense based on their fair value. Effective January 1, 2003, Verizon adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123. We plan to adopt SFAS No. 123(R) effective January 1, 2006, using the modified prospective method and expect that any impact will not be material to our financial position or ongoing results of operations.

Top
Features | Selected Financial Data and MD&A | Financials | Proxy | Investor Relations Website
* This is an interactive electronic version of Verizon’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders, and it is intended to be complete and accurate. The contents of this version are qualified in their entirety by reference to the printed version. A reproduction of the printed version is available in PDF format on this website.