|
The Human Resources Committee of the Board is responsible
for establishing and administering all policies and
plans related to compensation and benefits for the senior
management group, including the executives listed in
the Summary Compensation Table beginning on page 23
of this Proxy Statement. The individuals listed in that
table are referred to as the named executive officers.
Specifically, the Committee has the direct responsibility
to review and approve the corporate goals and objectives
relevant to the senior management group compensation
plans and programs and annually benchmarks the ongoing
competitiveness of these plans and programs in order
to evaluate whether they are achieving the desired goals
and objectives summarized in this report. The Committee
retains the services of an independent, outside consultant
to assist it in performing its duties. The Committee
reports to the Board of Directors on its actions and
recommendations following every meeting, and periodically
meets in executive session without members of management
present. Members of the Committee are non-management
directors who, the Board has determined, are independent
as required by applicable laws and regulations, the
listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, and
the Board’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.
This report summarizes the philosophy, structure, and
compensation levels of the Company’s executive
compensation programs for 2004.
PHILOSOPHY
The Committee oversees a compensation program that is
designed to support Verizon’s long-term strategy
and align the financial interests of the senior management
group with Verizon’s shareholders. The Committee
has established the following objectives for the Company’s
executive compensation program:
- To attract, motivate and retain high-performing
executive talent who drive Verizon’s success
and industry leadership;
- To reward individuals who achieve key operational
and financial goals and superior returns for shareholders;
- To provide a substantial portion of total compensation
opportunity at risk, tied to both annual and long-term
financial performance and strategic objectives.
The Committee evaluates and approves each component
of compensation (base salary, annual incentives, and
long-term incentives) and reviews and approves the individual
total compensation for the senior management group.
In considering the mix of elements comprising total
compensation, the Committee has emphasized long-term
pay and performance to stress the importance of achieving
Verizon’s long-term goals.
Each of Verizon’s 2004 incentive compensation
plans emphasizes a pay for performance philosophy and
is designed to reflect both individual and company performance.
They provide aggressive performance objectives that
serve to both motivate and retain executives. The Verizon
Short-Term Incentive Plan is designed to reward performance
in achieving certain internal business goals that are
primarily financial and operational in nature. When
the Company’s performance is better than the objectives
set for the performance period, employees receive higher
payouts, and when the Company’s performance does
not meet one or more of the key objectives, the employees
receive lower payouts. The Verizon Long-Term Incentive
Plan is designed to reward the creation of sustainable
shareholder value and more closely align the interests
of the Company’s senior management group with
that of its shareholders. For 2004, the Committee determined
that the senior management group’s long-term incentive
compensation should consist of a mix of performance
stock units and non-qualified stock options. These programs
are designed to reward employees when shareholder value
is created.
The total compensation of the senior management group
has been set at levels that are intended to be competitive
with market peers made up of other large, global, public
companies with whom Verizon competes for executive talent.
The Committee also benchmarks total direct compensation
(base salary, annual cash bonus, and long-term equity
awards) against an industry peer group of telecommunications,
broadband, wireless and cable companies. The Committee
has determined that the aggregate of Verizon’s
base pay and short-term compensation opportunity should
target the 50th percentile for market and industry peers
and that its long-term incentive opportunities should
target the third quartile. To ensure that Verizon’s
senior management compensation is consistent with these
levels, the Committee annually compares Verizon’s
total compensation and component pay levels to those
of its market and industry peer group companies.
The Company’s stock ownership guidelines encourage
each executive to achieve and maintain an appropriate
ownership stake in the Company. The ownership levels
are based on base salary and require a multiple of at
least five times base salary for the CEO and a multiple
of at least one to four times for other executives.
These guidelines apply to all senior management employees.
All named executive officers are currently in compliance
with the stock ownership guidelines. The table on page
29 shows the current ownership levels of these named
executive officers.
The Committee also recognizes that, from time to time,
it may be appropriate to enter into agreements with
certain key executives to ensure that Verizon continues
to retain their services. In general, these agreements
provide the key executives with certain protection (in
the form of severance pay) if they are involuntarily
terminated or their employment with the Company ends
prior to the time they would have otherwise elected
to retire. The existing agreements with the named executive
officers are described beginning on page 26 of this
Proxy Statement. On June 30, 2004, the Company’s
agreement with its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
Ivan Seidenberg, expired pursuant to its terms. Based
on market competitive practices, the Board has determined
that a multi-year agreement is no longer necessary.
Therefore, Mr. Seidenberg will no longer have an employment
agreement.
COMPONENTS OF COMPENSATION
There are three components of the compensation structure
for the senior management group: salary; a short-term
incentive award paid in cash; and a long-term incentive
award paid in cash. The majority of an executive’s
total compensation is performance-based and, therefore,
at risk because the value of such compensation (short-term
and long-term incentives) depends largely on the degree
of success in attaining both Company and individual
performance objectives.
Salary. The Company’s executive
salary structure is based on broad salary bands. Consideration
of salary adjustments, if any, is based on a review
of competitive market data relative to its market and
industry peer group companies and individual performance.
Base pay is set at the 50th percentile level of peer
group companies. In 2004, the senior management group
received salary increases based upon individual performance,
market changes in the value of positions, and the economic
and business conditions affecting Verizon at the time
of the evaluation. The salaries earned by the named
executive officers for 2004 are shown in column (c)
of the Summary Compensation Table on page 23.
Short-Term Incentive. Senior managers
are eligible to receive annual cash incentives under
the Verizon Short-Term Incentive Plan. The plan is designed
to support Verizon’s business and performance
goals by placing a sizable percentage of annual cash
compensation at risk if those goals are not achieved.
The targeted value of the short-term incentive award
is generally based on the recipient’s actual base
salary multiplied by a percentage applicable to the
recipient’s compensation band level. The percentage
is determined based on the level of responsibilities
of a particular job and on comparable positions within
industry peer group companies. For 2004, the awards
were adjusted based upon actual performance as measured
against pre-established performance objectives. These
objectives are based primarily upon financial measures,
particularly earnings per share and revenue excluding
the net impact of pension and post-retirement benefits.
In addition, a portion of the award is also based upon
two non-financial measures: customer service and diversity.
The Committee evaluates Verizon’s performance
on these measures against the performance of industry
peers. Depending on Verizon’s and the individual’s
performance, the awards can range from zero to two times
the targeted award value. When the Company’s performance
meets the pre-established performance objectives, employees
generally receive short-term incentive payouts at their
targeted levels. Correspondingly, when the Company’s
performance is better than the pre-established performance
objectives, employees generally receive payouts greater
than the targeted levels and when the Company’s
performance does not meet the pre-established performance
objectives employees generally receive payouts lower
than the targeted levels. Verizon produced strong 2004
financial results driven by Wireless revenue growth,
solid cash flow and increased margins. Also, in 2004,
Verizon led its industry peer group companies in virtually
every significant financial category and was able to
significantly reduce its total debt. The Committee approved
a performance percentage payout for each business segment
(corporate, wireless, domestic telecom, international
and information services), according to that business
segment’s contribution to the Company’s
overall performance. The performance percentages were
used to determine the short-term incentive award for
the named executive officers and other senior managers,
according to their respective responsibilities and individual
contribution. The amounts shown under “Bonus”
in column (d) of the Summary Compensation Table represent
the short-term incentive payments awarded to each of
the named executive officers for 2004.
Long-Term Incentive. The Company provides
long-term incentive opportunities under the Verizon
Long-Term Incentive Plan. These long-term incentives
may include non-qualified stock options, incentive stock
options, performance stock units, restricted stock grants
and stock appreciation rights. For 2004, long-term incentive
compensation consisted of a mix of performance stock
units and non-qualified stock options. This mix closely
aligns the interests of the Company’s senior management
group with the interests of its shareholders because
of the focus on external performance measures, stock
price and relative total shareholder return. The amount
of the long-term incentive award granted to a particular
employee is generally based on the recipient’s
actual base salary multiplied by a percentage applicable
to the recipient’s compensation band level. The
percentage is determined based on the level of responsibilities
of a particular job and on comparable positions within
industry peer group companies.
In 2004, 60% of an employee’s long-term incentive
compensation opportunity was granted in the form of
Performance Stock Units. Performance stock units represent
shares of Verizon stock that may become payable in cash
after the completion of a three-year performance cycle.
Actual payment of the performance stock units will be
determined based on Verizon’s Total Shareholder
Return (TSR) relative to the TSR of the companies that
make up the Standard & Poor’s 500 and to the
TSR of Verizon’s telecommunications, broadband,
wireless and cable industry peer group companies. No
performance stock units will be paid unless Verizon’s
relative TSR position meets a specific minimum threshold
percentage at the conclusion of the performance cycle.
The value of the award may increase or decrease based
on Verizon’s relative TSR position compared to
that of the companies in the Standard & Poor’s
500 and the companies in Verizon’s industry peer
group. The value of each performance stock unit is equal
to the fair market value of a share of Verizon’s
common stock on the date of the grant and will change
as the value of Verizon’s common stock changes.
The value of the performance stock units granted to
each of the named executive officers is shown in column
(f) of the Summary Compensation Table.
In 2004, 40% of an employee’s long-term incentive
compensation opportunity was granted in the form of
non-qualified stock options. All stock options are granted
with an exercise price equal to the fair market value
of Verizon’s stock on the date of the grant and
are not transferable during the recipient’s lifetime.
All stock options granted have a term of ten years and
vest in equal installments on the first, second, and
third anniversaries of the grant date. As it did in
2003, Verizon expensed its stock options granted in
2004. Verizon began expensing the fair market value
of stock options granted on or after January 1, 2003.
The number of stock options granted to each of the named
executive officers is shown in column (g) of the Summary
Compensation Table.
SUMMARY OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION CHANGES FOR
2005
In January 2005, the independent members of the Board
of Directors changed Mr. Seidenberg’s compensation
structure to align it with the changes made by the Human
Resources Committee to the compensation structure for
members of the senior management group in light of the
increasing competition in the telecommunications industry,
Verizon’s business strategy and in recognition
of shareholder interests and corporate responsibility.
Effective January 1, 2005, the Committee eliminated
the nonqualified supplemental retirement benefit under
the Verizon Income Deferral Plan (IDP). The IDP provided
a guaranteed pension credit to all senior managers in
an amount equal to 32% of annual pay that was in excess
of the IRS compensation limits. This retirement credit
under the IDP has been replaced by the Verizon Excess
Pension Plan, a nonqualified pension plan that provides
pension credits that range from 4%-7%; on compensation
that exceeds the IRS compensation limits. This is the
same pay-credit percentage range received by all other
management employees who participate in the Verizon
Management Pension Plan and the Verizon Excess Pension
Plan.
In addition, the value of the long-term incentive awards
for Verizon’s senior management group was adjusted
for the first time since 2000 to reflect market competitive
levels. The 2005 long-term incentive grants will be
made in the form of performance stock units and restricted
stock units to further link rewards to Verizon’s
financial performance and to increase in shareholder
value. Stock options have not been granted to senior
managers for 2005.
The executive flexible spending allowance for senior
managers was also eliminated, effective as of January
1, 2005, and the Committee took this into account in
assessing the changes to compensation structure.
These changes were made to further align the senior
management group with the performance of Verizon’s
stock by rewarding senior managers who drive marketplace
success, provide outstanding industry leadership and
increase shareholder value. Depending on the level of
a senior manager, a minimum of 63% and up to 88% of
total compensation for 2005 will be performance-based
and, therefore, at risk. This represents an increase
over 2004 levels by 8%. The value of short-term and
long-term incentives will depend on the degree of success
in attaining both Company and individual performance
objectives, thus, emphasizing the Company’s pay
for performance philosophy.
2004 COMPENSATION FOR IVAN SEIDENBERG
Mr. Ivan Seidenberg is Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Verizon. In 2004, under Mr. Seidenberg’s
leadership, the Company achieved a sizable increase
in shareholder value while also continuing to significantly
reduce its total debt. 2004 was also an extremely strong
year of outstanding growth in the wireless and broadband
business groups. The Company demonstrated an ability
to grow and build market share in a highly competitive
environment. Mr. Seidenberg’s 2004 compensation
was determined in accordance with the plans and policies
discussed in this report. His annual salary is shown
in column (c) of the Summary Compensation Table, and
his short-term incentive award is shown under “Bonus”
in column (d) of this table.
For 2004, Mr. Seidenberg was eligible for a short-term
incentive award ranging from $0 to $3,750,000. In 2004,
Verizon changed its growth profile by divesting non-strategic
assets, by extending its industry leadership in wireless,
and by gaining momentum in broadband, long-distance
and Enterprise markets. Revenues increased 5.7%, driven
by 23% revenue growth at Verizon Wireless. During the
year, Verizon added 6.3 million net new customers in
Wireless, as its total number of customers grew nearly
17% to 43.8 million. In its Wireline business, Verizon
added 1.2 million net new DSL customers for a total
of 3.6 million DSL lines in service at the end of 2004.
Verizon generated $21.8 billion of cash from operations.
Total debt was reduced by $6.1 billion, finishing the
year at $39.3 billion. Based on these results compared
to the objectives established at the beginning of the
year, Mr. Seidenberg received a 2004 short-term incentive
award of $3,375,000 in recognition of the Company’s
performance and his role in driving Verizon’s
outstanding results.
Mr. Seidenberg’s 2004 long-term incentive award
was maintained at its 2003 level of $10.5 million, which
represented a more than 10% reduction from its 2002
and 2001 levels of $12 million. As a result, on February
4, 2004, Mr. Seidenberg received 171,429 PSUs and 468,227
stock options. The option grant is reported in column
(g) of the Summary Compensation Table. The PSU grant
dollar value is reported in column (f) of the Summary
Compensation Table.
The independent members of the Board approved the first
increase in five years to Mr. Seidenberg’s salary,
reflecting the company’s success in creating growth
and building market share in a highly competitive environment.
Mr. Seidenberg’s salary increased $600,000, from
$1,500,000 to $2,100,000. His new base salary was determined
based on his individual performance in 2004, market
changes in the value of his position since 2000, and
the economic and business conditions affecting Verizon.
His new base salary is in alignment with the base salary
levels of other chief executive officers at other large
global public companies comparable to Verizon. This
new salary will be reflected in the summary compensation
table in Verizon’s 2006 proxy statement.
Mr. Seidenberg will no longer participate in the nonqualified
supplemental retirement benefit under the Income Deferral
Plan (IDP), which provided him a guaranteed annual pension
credit in an amount equal to 32% of his pay. This retirement
credit under the IDP has been replaced by the Verizon
Excess Pension Plan, which is a nonqualified pension
plan that provides pension credits that range from 4%-7%
(depending on age and service), on compensation that
exceeds the IRS compensation limits. This is the same
pay-credit percentage range received by all other management
employees who participate in the Verizon Management
Pension Plan and the Verizon Excess Pension Plan. In
addition, Mr. Seidenberg will no longer receive an executive
flexible spending allowance.
APPLICABLE TAX CODE PROVISION
Under the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993,
provisions were added to the Internal Revenue Code under
Section 162(m) that limit the tax deduction for compensation
in excess of one million dollars paid to certain executive
officers. Companies are permitted to exclude performance-based
compensation from the limit if that compensation meets
certain requirements. The Committee believes that the
short and long-term plans are performance driven and
therefore satisfy the requirements for exemption under
Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m). However, under
certain circumstances, the Committee will exercise its
discretion to make certain grants and awards that may
not comply with the terms and conditions under Section
162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code in order to maintain
the Committee’s flexibility to grant awards that
will continue to attract and retain qualified executives.
Respectfully submitted,
Human Resources Committee
Walter V. Shipley, Chairperson
Richard L. Carrión
Robert W. Lane
John R. Stafford
Dated: March 4, 2005
|